lundi 22 juillet 2019

Aquaponics

We have an experimental fish farm. Tilapia. It’s aquaponics, so there’s a plant fertilizer component too.

This is the final design, the grow-out tank system. It consists of a 250 gallon fish tank on the left and on the right is a 55 gallon drum for the biomedia filter.



What you see cost a hundred bucks, for the “tote” on the left, a major Craigslist score, we got two of them. The 55 gallon drum was free, from a miner we expedite for, we got two of them.

We have all the materials to complete the system we designed after a literature survey and experience of our own.

For now, we bought 94 tiny little tilapia, like micro-dots. This took seven weeks to accomplish, an an algae diet, which is pretty amazing:

On the left is "before" and on the right "after". Now they are just starting to take the first pelletized feed.

Everyone is in a 61 gallon system at the moment, consisting of a 55 gallon tank and 6 gallons in the filter system, which we designed ourselves. All the electric is on one circuit, I wired a separate circuit from the breaker to this system so it was on its own fuse.




This is the schematic which is scalable.

We have a unitized system of fish tank and biomedia filter, with a way to draw off the fertilizer.
The main tank has a spigot at the bottom to draw off solids. The biomedia filter can be cleaned and the finer fertilizer captured.



What is different about our system is that we have two media (rocks and batting) and combine functions that would require three tanks instead of two.
The fish tanks have big rocks at the bottom. They host media that like to eat fish poopies. But it also allows solids to accumulate and be drawn off now and then by the spigot at the bottom.

The pump in the bottom of the fish tank forces water up a line and then down to the bottom of the filter tank, which has rocks in the bottom, same reason. The media in our case is batting we got 40% off at the fabric store. It is wound tight around a copper line in the center. The water has to force its way through a lot of batting where it comes out at the top crystal clear.
The filtered water goes out a pipe and makes a waterfall into the 55 gallon tank. You need it to be a waterfall so that it oxygenates the water. Then you don’t need an aerator. This uniseal joint, and trimming a little 5 gallon bucket with a lid makes a 6 gallon filter system for the 55 gallon tank:



The batting worked so good we bought the fabric store out, my God the entire 710 gallon system cost $42 total for the media. Might as well be free, the pet store sells goldfish bowl sand for that price.

We have another 40 gallon system we are about to start up inside, it is getting a little crowded in the one above. We are going to put the smallest fish in the 40 gallon system. We are keeping the fish inside the cabin as long as we can, so we do not have to heat the main 610 gallon system out in the shop yet.

So basically we have a 100 gallon indoor system and a 600 gallon “ outdoor” system. Outdoors, there are two tank/filtration systems that are each designed for 50 fish. So 100 fish outdoors, 1.5 lbs. each, although they can grow a lot bigger. Inside, 150 little fish if we want to run it full bore.
The kids logged, skidded, and peeled timbers for a loft in our shop to house the outdoor tanks:



The timbers were notched to fit, then bolted together, and bolted to the log walls and purlins with lag bolts. All but two bolts scrounged up on the homestead.



That was the start of store-bought lumber, we can mill but I have leftover 2x6's and plywood from construction contracting. In the very first picture, my son is standing up in the finished loft with the tanks.

I’ll talk about electric use, feed costs, and such next time. But a little bit about why we are doing this.

We are going to sell live fish in the Philippines. We are learning the whole thing from breeding through meat production and “Aquaponics” (the fertilizer is for plants) for now. We want to run things at a scale commensurate with a real experimental farm, over 200 fish in various stages.

Protein production can be compared on efficiency grounds, the conversion of feed in pounds to meat in pounds. For beef, it is common to have 8 lbs. of feed required for 1 lb. of meat. For pork, about 2.5 lbs. of feed per lb. of pork. Fowl will get you down to 2:1 and turkeys even below 2:1.

These tilapia require 1.1 lbs of food to produce 1 lb. of fish, it is incredible. Plus you get the fertilizer, it is as valuable as bat guano. While the government schools are teaching kids PC rhetoric, these kids helped build a fish farm. It is a tautology to say it is homeschool because the kids never leave our sides, everything we do is homeschool.

Small percentage shifts in diet, from beef to fish, mean incredible relief on the earth’s resources. There is way too much pressure on the wild stocks around the Philippines, yet the ocean can support vastly more fish.


I saw a system for sale that was over $4,000 on the internet, I went looking for fun. We haven’t spent $400 yet and ours will handle order of magnitude more fish. Our filtration systems are absurdly large. I don’t care, the components were nearly free.

I am putting together a spreadsheet that is going to work out the cost per pound of fish. The grow-out stage is where you can really blow it on feed costs. But we have read a LOT of peer-review literature on this and are going to do some experimentation ourselves before finalizing our grow-out feed recipe. We will try to produce some of it ourselves, depending on how successful our experiments are.


dimanche 21 juillet 2019

Apollo Guidance Computer Restoration

A little late for the 50th Anniversary due to some IP issues going on, but thought that those who are interested in Apollo, or the computers of that era might get a kick out of this series of videos showing how a group of space computer nerds managed to get hold of, and restore to working order, an Apollo Era AGC.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...lisi_x7-Ut_-w7


An interesting read in prophesy

From a guy that is an expert in Nostradamus. Or so his book claims.

It has been around since 1967 so it was still remembered Jackie Gleason and Mae West playing around in the paranormal. Crap from the past to wallow in. Cool.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20190721_172819.jpg (68.5 KB)
File Type: jpg IMG_20190721_172944.jpg (53.8 KB)


A question about human ashes.

For quite awhile I have mulled over getting a small tattoo, on my lower arm, covering a scar from a youthful self-mutilation moment.

The image would be a Pegasus, but instead of a horse, a flying red fox. About the size of a nickel.

My question. The tattoo artist, knowing it would be a type of memorial for me, asked if I had ashes, because they can add them to the ink. I do, but I am curious. And curiosity made me realize how very little I know about ashes except the basics.

Would there be any risk factor in mixing them with tattoo ink? Thanks!


California couple arrested after strangling newborn baby in hospital, police say

California couple arrested after strangling newborn baby in hospital, police say


Quote:

VENTURA COUNTY, Calif. - A California couple has been arrested in connection with the death of a newborn baby, police said Friday.

The baby boy’s mother and her boyfriend allegedly choked the newborn until he was unconscious, according to the Oxnard Police Department.

Andrea Torralba Camacho, 20, and David Villa, 21, are accused of assault on a child by means of force resulting in the child’s death, authorities said.

Officers learned of the incident at 7:53 a.m. Friday and responded to St. John’s Regional Medical Center to investigate the infant’s suspicious injuries, police said. The baby was in critical condition and at one point became unresponsive. Medical staff tried to revive him but the baby died from his injuries, police said.

Like, what was wrong with putting the child up for adoption?

I hope these two get locked away for life and never get another chance to breed.


How to start the massive F-1 rocket engine ignition sequence

Here we have Scott Manley using his melliflous scottish voice to explain how the massive F-1 rocket engine works.https://youtu.be/2cldgl9IIyY


Why we can't have a popular vote

Over in the "Send her back" thread, some folks started a bit of a derail about proportional representation, the senate and the EC.

Thought I'd start a new thread to house that line of discussion.

One point that was made by a few posters was that the current system allowed rural voters who would otherwise be drowned out by city residents to have a voice.

I can agree that rural voters may have distinct interests, and that being a minority, their interests may not be well served by a system totally based of population proportional representation.

But why is this one minority interest group more important than other minority interest groups? Rural Americans is not the only group of people with particular interests who comprise a minority of the population. Why, in 2020 and going forward, does that minority deserve more of a voice in government than any other minority interest group?

I mean, if you say that rural voters will just get trampled by a government elected by the majority, what about black voters? Voters making minimum wage? Non-Christian voters? What makes rural interests uniquely deserving of representation beyond their proportion of the population?