Has anyone here discussed a recent article by J.D. Wynham et al written for an ethics forum on the NIST study by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers? Here is the paper:
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org...per_030714.pdf
Here is AE911's account of an event where the work was presented in poster form:
http://ift.tt/1zqy2AP
The paper is also on the IEEE site itself, but it can't be accessed that way without an account:
http://ift.tt/1DMFoMN
And here's the Wiki on the organization that sponsored the event and has the article on their site:
http://ift.tt/1DMFoMP
EDIT: For JayUtah's sake below, here is a Wikipedia section on the history of peer review, that super controversial process that helps but obviously doesn't settle the question of the overall quality of scholarly work:
http://ift.tt/1zqy5g1
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org...per_030714.pdf
Here is AE911's account of an event where the work was presented in poster form:
http://ift.tt/1zqy2AP
The paper is also on the IEEE site itself, but it can't be accessed that way without an account:
http://ift.tt/1DMFoMN
And here's the Wiki on the organization that sponsored the event and has the article on their site:
http://ift.tt/1DMFoMP
EDIT: For JayUtah's sake below, here is a Wikipedia section on the history of peer review, that super controversial process that helps but obviously doesn't settle the question of the overall quality of scholarly work:
http://ift.tt/1zqy5g1
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire