Continuation The Electric Comet Theory Boogaloo (Part 2)

This is the continuation thread of the original Electric Comet Theory thread found HERE. The split point is arbitrary, and please feel free to quote from the previous thread in this one.

Posted By:Agatha

Quote:

Originally Posted by ben m (Post 10457421) Sol88 isn't even picking nits, he's pretending to pick nits. His posts all sound like this: I mean, "picking nits" would at least require some sort of coherent statement. "Rosetta found X <link> which contradicts prediction Y made by Z <link>". Or "Yesterday Rosetta said 4 g/cm^3 and today they said 4.1 g/cm^3". Or "Rosetta replaced the image in that press release with a new one." That'd be picking nits. Sol88 can't even manage that.

Nit pick??? data says 67P is fluffy like snow according to the density and MUPUS says hard as (sintered ice) or rock??? as well as the lander "bouncing" off the surface.



CONCERT says no voids.



You have dust levitating and being transported by electric fields but feel the need to invoke fluidization by gas escaping.



Yo have CO, CO2 and H20 being produced in the same location during different times of the local day from a comet made of rock.



and it looks like rock (including crystallised silicates, clay and carbonates) with no surface ice detected, "How did clay and carbonates form in frozen comets?"...mainstream brushed over that chestnut.



Major problems reconciling the problem of heat transportation below the dust layer to start "sublimation"



Dust that "falls" apart but towering cliffs on the surface.





but yeah the dirtysnowball is the best guess mainstream could come up with.



As the posters on the ROSETTA BLOG site are asking, some non EU proponents are calling the standard theory into question.



and i think that's a good thing, we need to ask those hard questions.



The mainstream went to the comet with well defined preconceived ideas and have been surprised at every turn but to think of another theory is taboo.



AND



It's not my job to prove to you the ELECTRIC COMET is correct you can make your own mind up based on the multitude of data not agreeing with the standard model. If you think they're dirtysnowballs, dirtysnowballs they are.