Sexism in Space: How shirt designs keep women out
This thread is inspired by the above entitled thread about sexism. In particular, post #10 by Verklagekasper
in response to a post by Ziggurat:
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
If the taxpayer money was the concern, I don't see how Americans or Australians have a say in this. Besides, if "plenty of them don't want to see that" was a valid argument, then, for the sake of gender equality, we have to renegotiate how women have to dress in public as well. Otherwise, when women have the right to dress up in any way, as the "slut walks" keep telling, then men also have the right to the display of machismo (which this is actually about, not sexism). If "plenty of them don't want to see that" was a valid argument, where even to stop then? Plenty of people might feel offended by his tattoos. So what.
I say: what's good for the goose is good for the gander
what's bad for the goose is bad for the gander.
But because of Fascist liberals and ball breaking firebrands a type of hypocritical sexism was created which allows women to wear provocative clothing, use provocative language and still be able to get a guy fired for saying something naughty, usually in response to what the women has just said (my experience after 10 yrs. working in casinos).
Unfortunately, there is a systemic poison that has permeated our culture as shown by what I consider to be a shocking, and offensive abuse of little girls.
http://ift.tt/1xJVIjD
of space exploration
This thread is inspired by the above entitled thread about sexism. In particular, post #10 by Verklagekasper
in response to a post by Ziggurat:
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
Quote:
I am. Not because I'm worried about hostile work places, but because when you're on TV talking about the accomplishments of a vast organization funded by taxpayer money as one of the employees of said taxpayer-funded organizations, I think a little professionalism is in order. You really should be considerate of what those taxpayers want to see from you, because, again, you're their employee. And plenty of them don't want to see that. |
If the taxpayer money was the concern, I don't see how Americans or Australians have a say in this. Besides, if "plenty of them don't want to see that" was a valid argument, then, for the sake of gender equality, we have to renegotiate how women have to dress in public as well. Otherwise, when women have the right to dress up in any way, as the "slut walks" keep telling, then men also have the right to the display of machismo (which this is actually about, not sexism). If "plenty of them don't want to see that" was a valid argument, where even to stop then? Plenty of people might feel offended by his tattoos. So what.
I say: what's good for the goose is good for the gander
what's bad for the goose is bad for the gander.
But because of Fascist liberals and ball breaking firebrands a type of hypocritical sexism was created which allows women to wear provocative clothing, use provocative language and still be able to get a guy fired for saying something naughty, usually in response to what the women has just said (my experience after 10 yrs. working in casinos).
Unfortunately, there is a systemic poison that has permeated our culture as shown by what I consider to be a shocking, and offensive abuse of little girls.
http://ift.tt/1xJVIjD
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire