Currently there are three no-planers arguing there were no planes involved in the September 11th attacks and planes, crews, passengers and presumably anyone who knew the people aboard the planes never existed...or something, but rest assured, there was no planes deliberately crashed that day. That is at the root of their arguments.
Debunkers, of course, dismiss no-planer theories as utter hogwash from the start and demand evidence. What is usually provided are grainy screen grabs from multi - generational youtubes, images that support their pet theory by scribbling lines on them that are meaningful to them, and incredulity. Ultimately, these theories are rejected as garbage.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".
The events accepted by nearly everyone on the planet, four airliners were hijacked by islamic terrorists and deliberately crashed, is supported by a mountain evidence and therefore it is the no-planer's burden of proof and support the root of their argument: no planes.
Or is it?
More often than than not, no-planers attempt to shift the burden of proof and demand evidence of planes, despite the mountain of evidence which destroys their arguments. Despite this, no-planers reject the "Official Story" as garbage.
So, who has the burden of proof and why?
Debunkers, of course, dismiss no-planer theories as utter hogwash from the start and demand evidence. What is usually provided are grainy screen grabs from multi - generational youtubes, images that support their pet theory by scribbling lines on them that are meaningful to them, and incredulity. Ultimately, these theories are rejected as garbage.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".
The events accepted by nearly everyone on the planet, four airliners were hijacked by islamic terrorists and deliberately crashed, is supported by a mountain evidence and therefore it is the no-planer's burden of proof and support the root of their argument: no planes.
Or is it?
More often than than not, no-planers attempt to shift the burden of proof and demand evidence of planes, despite the mountain of evidence which destroys their arguments. Despite this, no-planers reject the "Official Story" as garbage.
So, who has the burden of proof and why?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire