Child dies from drinking "bath milk", producer mocked FDA regs against raw milk

So the producer posted images on FB promoting the supposed health benefits of raw milk, yet the product they sold was labeled "not for human consumption". When the inevitable happened and a child died the producer expressed "shock".



http://ift.tt/12QwYYP

Quote:

The organic farm whose cosmetic, unpasteurised milk has been associated with the death of a toddler previously mocked the US food authority for labelling unpasteurised milk as unsafe. A three-year-old child died after consuming unpasteurised Mountain View Organic Bath Milk, which is labelled “not for human consumption” and “for cosmetic purposes only”.

Here's the images in question - do you think this is the sort of material a milk producer would disseminate if they really expected that their product was not for human consumption?











Should these people be merely sued or are manslaughter charges warranted?