Claim: Fossilized sea urchin in inter-tidal area at Giza, submerged long ago

Lotsa pics at 2 links below. at link below.



Rather than typically a part of the limestone bedrock ...this fossil is found sitting horizontal on top of a cut block at Giza.



It is associated with claims Giza was once submerged.

Quote:

“Since the Mokattam limestone is formed out of miniscule fragmented marine shells such as numulites and echinoids that date back to the Eocene Epoch which is circa 30 million years ago, geologists and archeologists are debunking this discovery believing that this petrified marine creature has eroded out of the limestone block. I disagree due to these forth coming points; first, this petrified marine creature’s exoskeleton is in pristine condition with minute details of the shell perforation showing clearly, therefore it must have been exiting from a much later date such as the Pleistocene or early Holocene periods Second, this petrified (sea urchin like) creature is laying gravitational flat in its natural sitting position on the surface of this temple block. Third, it is living in its natural environment which is in the intertidal range in a shallow lagoon with sea bed sediments. Fourth, it is not a miniscule fragment like most shells that make the limestone formation, but a large entire specimen.”

http://ift.tt/18Nn3X1



http://ift.tt/18Nn514



academia .edu also has much or all of the ancient canal builders website