Just hours after ‘psychic’ Noreen Renier completed her interview on Coast to Coast AM on March 1, 2015, my phone rang. The two unidentified callers politely informed me that while they understood why I’d encouraged the curtailing of critical websites covering Noreen Renier, my decision was unwise. Well. . . actually they used something a lot stronger than unwise.
They noted Noreen Renier’s 158-minute Coast to Coast AM interview had been aired before an audience estimated at 2.4 million listeners. And such listeners clearly needed to have access to the real facts behind her distortions. Well. . . “distortions” wasn’t exactly how they phrased it.
After some back-and-forth they told me that more than two dozen unnamed personnel both inside and outside of the U.S. had in 2014 reached an agreement. If Noreen Renier wasn’t going to answer questions posed by critics and independent researchers, then they would provide the best answers they could find. And those answers would come from recorded and written public responses Noreen Renier had made, or would make.
A rather clever answer to her years of ignoring many questions posed.
To my surprise they then directed me to a website to ‘watch along with others’ which while clearly under construction had already months of consolidation work behind it. Within hours I received calls from others who were likewise informed and we’ve watched from afar as the framework has evolved into what is now a ‘completed’ site.
A call earlier today offered for consideration whether I would consider notifying International Skeptics Forum participants of the site, as many were aware of it throughout Europe.
http://ift.tt/1FjIueU
I’ve been told indirectly that others will be making comments and suggestions on how the site should further evolve. As the site encourages Ms. Renier to respond publicly to its “findings” on the International Skeptics Forum, her responses will be here for all to see. And it’s my understanding funding has been arranged to extend the site under multiple languages via independent global sub sites.
I appreciate the privilege in announcing any new site as a reader. The management and expansion of this project have obviously been in very capable hands. And an enormous amount of work has been completed by many and it shows. Now let’s see whether those “findings” on the website are challenged for updating by Noreen Renier.
One thought is how many links might such a site collect? Please note some of its own operate to others already.
Comments?
They noted Noreen Renier’s 158-minute Coast to Coast AM interview had been aired before an audience estimated at 2.4 million listeners. And such listeners clearly needed to have access to the real facts behind her distortions. Well. . . “distortions” wasn’t exactly how they phrased it.
After some back-and-forth they told me that more than two dozen unnamed personnel both inside and outside of the U.S. had in 2014 reached an agreement. If Noreen Renier wasn’t going to answer questions posed by critics and independent researchers, then they would provide the best answers they could find. And those answers would come from recorded and written public responses Noreen Renier had made, or would make.
A rather clever answer to her years of ignoring many questions posed.
To my surprise they then directed me to a website to ‘watch along with others’ which while clearly under construction had already months of consolidation work behind it. Within hours I received calls from others who were likewise informed and we’ve watched from afar as the framework has evolved into what is now a ‘completed’ site.
A call earlier today offered for consideration whether I would consider notifying International Skeptics Forum participants of the site, as many were aware of it throughout Europe.
http://ift.tt/1FjIueU
I’ve been told indirectly that others will be making comments and suggestions on how the site should further evolve. As the site encourages Ms. Renier to respond publicly to its “findings” on the International Skeptics Forum, her responses will be here for all to see. And it’s my understanding funding has been arranged to extend the site under multiple languages via independent global sub sites.
I appreciate the privilege in announcing any new site as a reader. The management and expansion of this project have obviously been in very capable hands. And an enormous amount of work has been completed by many and it shows. Now let’s see whether those “findings” on the website are challenged for updating by Noreen Renier.
One thought is how many links might such a site collect? Please note some of its own operate to others already.
Comments?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire